Intel’s Moorestown to Compete in ‘Handheld Computers’ Sector

Posted on 14 April 2010, Last updated on 14 April 2010 by

This is a follow-on article to ‘Is Tunnel Creek the new Consumer Handheld CPU from Intel? No. (Better Things Are Coming)

I define a smart device as being mobile, always on, always connected, sensor-aware and having what I call a dynamic operating system. That is, an OS that is interesting to use, stylish and that is ‘point-of-sale capable’ via an active application and content ecosystem. The prime example of a dynamic operating system is Apple’s iPhone OS.

In this article I want to talk about Intel’s Moorestown, a platform Intel has been public about  for over 2 years. It’s Intel’s stab at a platform for the mobile, always-on, always connected segment. That is, smart devices. From smartphones and smart tablets all the way up to smart netbooks. As ARM-based smartphones get bigger and more powerful and already have ALL the smart features required, there’s a huge risk to Intel so clearly there’s a serious business reason for doing this and getting it right.

At IDF in Beijing today, Pankaj Kedia presented the latest information on the Moorestown platform and in his slides, he gives a good overview of where the device is targeted and what its key features are. Let me walk you through some of the slides. (Obviously I wasn’t present for the presentation and i’m not privvy to Pankaj’s notes. These are simply my opinions.)

threat-opportunity

Here’s the threat. I doubt Pankaj would have used that expression though as it’s clearly being taken as an opportunity.

tablets

For the first time, Intel have started to reference the tablet segment when talking about Moorestown. Clearly this is becoming a topic of interest for their potential customers. The ultra mobile PC years are referenced as the ‘first coming.’

roadmap

Here’s a diagram that shows where Moorestown would sit in terms of products. If I had drawn that slide I would have also included the ‘smart’ netbook segment. Moorestown is likely to scale up to processing power beyond the top of what ARM-based platforms can product right now and there’s a good opportunity to defend against the risk of ARM moving into that segment of the netbook market. (See tomorrows article ‘A Smart Netbook Image’ for more on that.)

platform-overview

This is as much of the architecture as has been made public so far but thought leaks and discussions with engineers and developers we can say with some confidence that the graphics and hardware video acceleration is based on the GMA500 GPU (possibly clocked higher than on Menlow) and included 720p hardware encoding (for HD video recording.) The bus between Langwell and Lincroft is likely to be DMI (not PCIe) and as you can see, there are tightly coupled control and communications chips. Brierstown is responsible for power management.

featureset

As with Tunnel Creek, the CPU includes hyperthreading which can boost effective performance. Burst (bus boost) and Turbo (cpu boost) technology is also included. Intel have previously said that the nominal clockrate is 600Mhz with boosting to 1.6Ghz although we suspect there will be different versions of Lincroft spanning smartphone to netbook applications. One of the most important features and something that sets Lincroft apart from  Tunnel Creek is ‘Power Gating’ which allows Moorestown to compete with high-end ARM-based smartphone platforms. It is this feature that is allowing the CPU to idle to 1/50th of the idle power we saw on Menlow.

More information on Power Gating in this article

power-management

An interesting point from this slide is ‘OS Guided’ power management. What that means is that some of the power management features won’t work with Windows. MeeGo is the primary operating system for this platform and the two products are being developed side-by-side. Overall, we should see a 50% platform (not including screen backlight I assume) power reduction in average usage scenarios, and huge improvements in idle power drain. Overall it allows the platform to run in a similar power profile as high-end ARM-based solutions such as Tegra 2, Ti OMAP 34xx and Apples A4 solution.

The next public check-point for Intel will be Computex in Taiwan, June 2010 so unless Intel (or their customers) release information before then, we’ll have to wait a few months for more details. I’ll be in Taiwan for Computex so stay tuned for more coverage.

Note: Products are still planned for the second half of 2010. Two products have been announced. The LG GW990 smartphone and the Open Peek Media Phone.

Slides courtesy of Intel and available in the ‘Content Catalogue

11 Comments For This Post

  1. momchil says:

    i thought that aava mobile’s smartphone is also planned for this year. it is running moorestown.

  2. admin says:

    The Aava device is an OED device looking for a manufacturer/oem If someone picks it up it will come to market but not under the Aava brand. I have a feeling that it was commissioned by Intel as a kind of developers phone.

  3. DavidC1 says:

    The total power reductions are due to integration(like the “Jellybeans” and graphics and memory controller), and low power SoC process, along with the Power Gating.

    I still think a Windows 7 based Moorestown should offer significant benefits over Menlow.

    Seriously, Microsoft needs to get scaled down Windows 7(not Windows Mobile 7, hah!) with phone support and better power management support. If done well, it might sell good, but that’s a pipe dream, sigh.

  4. DavidC1 says:

    BTW, lack of big screen for Windows usage is fine. Just give us HDMI out support like they seem to be doing on some prototype smartphone devices.

  5. momchil says:

    btw here is impressive video showing meego in action – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdulMtEMnN8

  6. Schugy says:

    Finally the Atom becomes the processor it always should have been. Time to take it serious. The x86 overhead will become more and more negligible.
    Hope AMD will get there one day too.

  7. theluketaylor says:

    The fact moorestown uses LPDDR RAM means it will perform lower than the chip you are used to in your netbook. Since it’s still a 2 chip platform it can’t possibly match ARM for load power and will likely struggle to match idle power. This is still a pretty weak offering from intel.

  8. DavidC1 says:

    Considering how only 2 years ago people were claiming it was “impossible” for Atom to reach smartphone levels, this is quite a big advancement.

    They aren’t aiming at the dirt cheap, ultra simple devices, but something that actually requires processing power. You probably can’t make the cheapest and the lowest power device using x86, but regular smartphone to high end smartphone category, it’s very well doable.

    TI had a presentation where they compared their Cortex A8 with Moorestown back when Intel was claiming 10x idle power reduction. There was 2x difference between the two in battery life in light usage scenarios, I’d say with 50x they might be close enough.

    Smartphone ARM chips do not achieve ultra low power solely through the main chips. The supporting platform also uses low power. Moorestown will get similar low power on its platform as well.

  9. APGuru says:

    I have heard from inside source that LG cancelled the Moorestown phone only a few weeks after prototypes were shown at CES 2010. It still has serious power concerns.

  10. Janell Purrington says:

    Greetings, I located your internet page through google on account that it came up for “computers” but had problems viewing the website for some reason. It was giving some sort of error code at the top of the page. Just thought I’d let you know.

  11. Shanaz Simpson says:

    I honestly like the template you are using for this blog, can you let me know where you got it from.

Search UMPCPortal

Find ultra mobile PCs, Ultrabooks, Netbooks and handhelds PCs quickly using the following links:

Acer Aspire Switch 10
10.1" Intel Atom Z3745
Acer C740
11.6" Intel Celeron 3205U
VIA Nanobook
7.0" VIA C7-M
Lenovo Ideapad Flex 10
10.1" Intel Celeron N2806
Acer Aspire E11 ES1
11.6" Intel Celeron N2840
Dell Chromebook 11
11.6" Intel Celeron 2955U
Dell Latitude E7440
14.0" Intel Core i5-4200U
Acer TravelMate B113
11.6" Intel Core i3
HP Elitebook 820 G2
12.5" Intel Core i5 5300U
Acer Chromebook 11 CB3-131
11.6" Intel Celeron N2807